you wanna build a fast street car? you want something fun and different to tool around in? find out what suits you, what you can do to it, and how much it'll cost!
|
car |
weight |
stock |
reliable street hp |
MAX HP/ |
engine |
cost |
drive config |
Wheels: |
comments and
overall |
performance/toughness
engine |
chassis
handling/ |
body looks/rust
resistance/ |
|
Corvete |
3400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the american sportscar. first and second gens are too expensive, third gen looks the best of the affordable vettes, but the 4th gen is probably your best bargain. you CAN stuff a big block in any vette, however the 4th and 5th gen vettes have a great drivetrain and handle better than all the earlier gens. for 30 grand you can have an absolutely incredible car by all respects. |
8/9 |
8/8 |
7/10/7 |
|
Camaro/Firebird |
|
|
SB
n/a 520 |
|
|
|
RWD 2/3/4sp |
5x120.7mm |
the quintessential musclecar. stay away from the 3rd + 4th gen, they are laden with problems, emissions equip. and poor build quality, and the 305.all can be built to handle excellently, though 5th/6th gen do so better as they a rather large cars, also a downside..interior sucks on all. |
6/8
350 gen1 |
6/7 |
7/5/4 |
|
Omni |
2450 |
140/160 |
|
2.0
l destroked |
2.2
turboI |
1500
engine |
5sp
FWD 3sp
AUTO 430 |
5x100 |
fun FWD, super-cheap parts, crude suspension, torque-king motor, handles very well on smoother surfaces. hooligan machine for relatively cheap |
6/7
(2.2 turboI) |
7/7 |
5/9/3 |
|
Neon |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cheapish, evolution on the P body(SHADOW) and the 2.2. easy to work on, easy to find, handle great on all surfaces, not a whole lot of susp. travel though, so don't rally! Mexican 2.4l turbo stratusR/T engine/trans bolts in w/ custom driveshafts. Earlier 2.0 liters have a headgasket leaking problem, fixable by replacing the headgasket. If you have a 2.2 it can be stuffed in these, but i recommend turboing the 2.0 mill or swapping in a 2.4. |
|
8/7 |
7/9/5 |
|
AE-86 Corolla (4AGE) |
2250 |
|
|
|
4AGE |
|
|
|
RWD drift-machine. a longtime favorite of drifters, this thing can be made to handle very well and fit a lot of different engines. I've even seen turbo 3 rotor 20Bs in these! Lightweight on a medium wheelbase with RWD and good balance means a very fun and controllable car. This is why they are used for drifting in japan, and rallying all over. |
9/7 |
7/6 |
7/5/5 |
|
MR2
1st gen |
|
|
|
|
4AGE |
|
|
|
1st gen is ultra lightweight mid-engine handling machine. they are a LOT of fun to drive, and the bigger, more powerful 2nd gen brother is a more grown up and weighty, duller tool for the same job, the 3rd gen MRS goes back to lightweight roots and is a good bit more refined, but still doesn't come with a roof. they all handle great, can make good power, and readily available bigger brakes, these cars are more fun to drive than they are fast, but they can be VERY fast. |
|
7/7 |
6/5/5 |
|
Celica |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240SX |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
starting to get really inexpensive. handle well, big brakes are easy, sr20 swaps are common and simple. a great light, RWD modern car, with a roof and a nice interior. |
|
|
7/6/6 |
|
944 Turbo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
excellent balance and controllability, can be built to handle incredibly well, large wheelwells, spend however much you want or can. it's easy to get carried away! expensive driveline repairs and engine parts. They can make some pretty insane power though. Turbos have a habit of getting cooked on these. |
|
|
8/8/7 |
|
911 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
very short wheelbase makes them twitchy, but that's half the draw. big power with a chevy v8 conversion. pick a year you like, make your 911 look like that easily. |
|
|
8/6/9 |
|
69
valiant |
3000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
bodies : light, big displacement, good handling, unaerodynamic,
street bruisers take lots of "big car" parts for
DIRT CHEAP RWD v8 performance! |
|
|
7/7/4 |
|
Civic
EG |
2500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4x100 |
huge aftermarket- used and JDM parts relatively cheap. the B16/B18 series engines have been in production for quite some time, over a decade, and a used motor is easy to find, so swaps are VERY common. the double wishbone front suspension is probably the best FWD front suspension. too bad the RSX and new civic have regular Mcphersons.. |
|
|
7/8/8 |
|
Miata |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
always
fun, the miata 1.8l has more power but is heavier, the later gen
is more stiff in the frame, but a bit heavier |
|
|
7/8/8 |
|
RX-7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROTARY! makes these cars light and have a low center of mass, great weight distribution and leaves plenty of room for a good suspension sytem. 1st gens are rusty, light and are crude, but if you must, 84 GSL-SE go second gen turboII, or if you can afford it, 3rd gen. the Japanese market has tons of stuff for FD and FC RX, there, the FC is more popular than the FD. Note!: there's no storage space to be spoken of! can't take tires to the track in em! |
|
|
6/4/8 |
|
Golf
/GTI / A4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4x100 |
the original FWD sportscar killer. these are always fun cars. as they get newer, they get heavier, and the HP doesn't really keep up. the good engines are the 2.0 16V and the 1.8t. vr6 cars are quick, but a bit too nose heavy and very expensive to get more HP. you CAN put an Audi Quatro driveline and floorpan in an A2 or later and get yourself a 4wd little hatch. very cool! the a5s a1 a2s are recommended, though a4s and a3s are getting bountiful and pretty cheap. |
|
|
8/6/3 |
|
Supra |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Toyota's big gun;. the first gen's body styling is very eighties, the motors are all very durable, strut suspension up front and independent rear. big brakes, first gens are underpowered, second gen turbo is a very well balanced car, but heavy. the third gens are lighter, with more power, but basically the same car with a better wrapper. comparable in lineage to the corvette. a great car, very comfortable to drive very fast in. |
|
|
6/4/3 |
|
Triumph
TR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
English sportster. You can be assured that every piece that falls off your triumph will be of the highest english quality! Well, in all seriousness, rust is the biggest problem in tese cars, the next biggest problem is with the lucas electronics. Get rid of them if you can. There are kits and rewiring |
|
|
6/2/2 |
|
Impreza(US) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4WD, middleweight with a good stock suspension. the 2.5RS has taken a backseat to the WRX, both make better rally and off roaders than straight tarmac cars, but they are good at tarmac nonetheless. The single cammer 2.5s are lighter and put out more power, as well as more reliable. Fiting a Japanese spec engine into a US model requires all sorts of changes, even the crossmember, and then the steering gears get in the way. Major work. |
|
|
7/9/6 |
|
240Z (260/280) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lightish, RWD, beautifull and underpowered. The factory made some "Scarabs", with a chevy 350 for power and blacked out body. You can put all sorts of engines in these, though the dual SU sidedraft 2.4 lasts a long time left to it's own. They are rusty and the dashes crack very frequently. Interior otherwise is great, but rather outdated. |
|
|
8/4/6 |
|
BMW 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Light, fun, too cool, and practical. 320 parts swap in easily, and a bunch of later 3 series stuff fits too. there are tons of parts still in production for them. The early ones have prettier taillirghs and minimal bumpers, 73 on models are slightly heavier and laden with emmissions equipment. They all rust and usually come in pairs. You won't find a turbo 2002, but the early 2002tii is next best. |
|
|
6/2/5 |
|
DeTomaso Pantera |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good looking, wedgy body, ford 351 power, ZF transaxle, big wheelwells, and a racing history. What else needs to be said? You can end up spending WAY too much on these. No really, like 300 grand is not too tough to spend! |
|
|
8/5/2 |
|
lotus esprit (4cyl /turbo) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7/6/3 |
|
VOLVO
RWD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aircooled turbos are limited in power by reliability, the waterpumper turbos are bulletproof and begging for more boost, the chassis is ok, looks ok, but there are companies that make parts for even early volvos, and factory parts are still produced. |
|
|
4/7/3 |
|
Mustang FOX 5.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
while the camaros sucked in the eighties and early nineties, the mustangs rocked. anything with a 5.0 is great. it was their fuel injection that made them so great too. well, that and the lightweight fox platform. though it in itself has it's own problems, like no panard bar and quad shocks, remedies are available for any qualms with the car, and you can build a car from scratch with aftermarket parts. You can also turn your 5.0 into a cobra with factoryfive. |
|
|
|
|
Grand
National |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.8 litres of turbo power! If you want it, get the GN or GNX!(also in the regal T type) if you like the v8, get a regal or caprice and swap in anythign you want or find. Made by the assload- people can't give these cars away fast enough, and you can take a pretty nice one from a grannie for a couple hundred. Though they really are nothing spectacular, they can house a v8 and all the driveline to use it, bodywise the bumper palstics are always gone, stay away from big hoodscoops and chrome rims and trim, and they don't look too bad. Did i say cheap yet? |
|
|
|
|
Suzuki SwiftGTI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impala SS/ Caprice |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiero |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VW BUG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Super lightweight, rear engine, rwd. |
|
|
|
|
Datsun 510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW M couple |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some say it's ugly, some say it's good looking, it's faster and more aerodynamic than the convertible, and a good bit stiffer. I say looks follow function, and that makes it a beauty in my eyes. You can supercharge these bad boys and do a good bit of suspension work, though not a lot is necessary to make them awesome. They win autoXes. Nuff said. |
|
|
|
|
Ford Lightning |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
El-Camino |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Haul your parts or haul ass. Not as much load capacity as the lightning or any fullsize truck for that matter, but still cool. They made these by |
|
|
|
|
AMX |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mini |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
turbo RWD action in an stylish package. like a scaled down supra with a gadgety interior. one of the first real import performance cars. these things have a lot of performance potential and make great streetcars. cylinder heads crack, but the engine is tough as nails and a real hemi. engines are all over the place and they can be bought dirt cheap. get the 89 ESI-R |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reading the ratings: what do those stupid numbers mean?
|
rating |
body looks |
body rust resistance |
body modability |
performance/toughness |
Acceleration |
chassis |
chassis |
rating |
|
10 |
BRILLIANCE |
what's rust? |
it's
a WHAT originally? no way. |
makes
all the power you can |
|
71+
mph slalom |
either
won last year's LeMans or was made |
10 |
|
9 |
ROLLING SEX |
double
galvanized panels. |
wide-body
kits, fiberglass front ends |
makes
awesome power, and there's |
|
70
mph slalom |
doesn't
need a thing. this baby's got |
9 |
|
8 |
VERY SHARP |
you've
seen rust on one of these |
at
least two dozen mix-n-match |
tons
of power, easy to get more |
|
69
mph slalom |
just
needs subframe connectors or |
8 |
|
7 |
COOL |
after
10 years, a bit of touchup is |
there's
a bunch of stuff out specifically |
good
stock power, you'll need |
|
68
mph slalom |
needs
a 4 pt hoop or cage. maybe just |
7 |
|
6 |
NOT BAD |
your uncle's hasn't rusted yet |
you
can get a couple different |
motor
can put out 125% more |
|
66
mph slalom |
needs
a 6 pt cage for racing. serious street |
6 |
|
5 |
OK |
but your dad's only lasted 5 years |
a
handful of parts, the generic stuff |
average
power output. nothing |
|
64
mph slalom |
you're
going racing, you need a 6 pt cage |
5 |
|
4 |
TACKY |
your
on your second undercoating |
the
factory body-kit is the only thing |
better
buy a turbo! you're not gonna |
|
62
mph slalom |
you
NEED at least a 12 pt cage if |
4 |
|
3 |
UGLY |
XO-RUST |
there
is one aerodynamics package |
you'll
be spending an arm and a leg |
|
60
mph slalom |
use
a 4pt cage if you're driving it with |
3 |
|
2 |
EYESORE |
XO-RUST
is not enough, |
you
COULD put on different wheels |
what
is performance? airflow? |
|
57
mph slalom |
make
a tubular interior chassis. don't |
2 |
|
1 |
INCOURAGEABLE |
*CLUNK*
there goes the last |
it's
a 1986 Yugo GV, there is no |
powered
by Ralph Nader |
|
55MPH
slalom |
floppy
like a raw pita in SF. there is no |
1 |
**on good street tires and a sorted suspension you can expect either slalom or skidpad, maybe both.
PLEASE NOTE! i am human so any data on this page may be wrong! CROSS-REFERENCE!
i have done a lot of research, but if you see any errors, please don't hesitate to contact me and they will be sorted out as quickly as possible! as all the details can be too much for one person. thanks!
note: tech support is not responsible for anything you do! we are professionals - don't try this at home. Copyright (c) 2002 jason economou. Tech Support is not a registered trademark of anybody.